Wednesday, 4 March 2015

AIMS Ireland AGM - March 14th - Presentation of further #WMTY2014 survey results & special guest speaker, Philomena Canning

 
Come to our AGM! 14th March, 11:30am - 4pm at Outhouse, Capel Street, Dublin 1.

Exclusive first look at next tranche of What Matters to You survey results

AND

Special guest speaker Philomena Canning SECM - "Outcomes of a midwife's practice under the HSE Home Birth Scheme, October 2008 - September 2014"
...
 
 
 
 
 

Friday, 27 February 2015

AIMS Ireland Statement regarding Philomena Canning being reinstated to practice by HSE

Feb 27, 2015: AIMS Ireland Statement regarding Philomena Canning being reinstated to practice by HSE

Once again, AIMSI would like to highlight the stark inconsistencies with which the HSE will shut down an independent midwife's practice with 'no foundation' while continuing to ignore the grave concerns arising in some hospital maternity services.

While AIMS Ireland are delighted that Philomena Canning can now return to caring for women and babies, many questions remain on how the HSE were supported to illegally purse a midwife who followed protocol and appropriate practice guidelines set out by the HSE themselves in the first place.

A faction within the HSE were allowed to break precedent in removing a midwife from her practice, with no adverse outcome or foundation, while other clinicians continue to practice without suspension following adverse outcomes in maternity hospitals during the same period. This action not only undermines the national home birth service and clinical practice of Philomena Canning, but left 29 women and their babies at risk without care options.

AIMS Ireland note that the timing of this action against Philomena Canning occurred following announcements that she was setting up Ireland's first birth centre and statements of concern regarding the HSE criteria for homebirth and conditions within the MOU which undermine women's rights. It is clear to AIMS Ireland that this case was a 'warning shot' by the HSE.

The HSE need to answer the many questions arising from this injustice and the many others like it. AIMS Ireland are in full support of an independent inquiry into events contributing to the action against Philomena Canning.

AIMS Ireland expects to see the HSE act to swiftly withdraw cover from any clinician involved in future incidents with adverse outcomes in all maternity settings. We expect the HSE to apply this new high bar for all health care providers. Women giving birth in hospital deserve the same protections afforded to homebirth mothers.

Tuesday, 13 January 2015

Ireland's Maternal Death Rate - Depends on who you are asking.

In Today's Irish Times, John Fitzgerald shares a piece on CSO statistics for Ireland called, ‘Vital Statistics’ sheds light on inequalities in life expectancy”. The articles states, "While the death rate also fell in the Republic, it was not till the late 1970s that it reached the UK level. Today, in spite of recent tragedies that have received significant media attention, the maternal death rate is very low, at about three per 100,000 births, marginally lower than that in Northern Ireland, England and Wales."

Once again AIMS Ireland need to highlight that CSO figures for maternal death of 3 per 100,000 are inaccurate and under-reported. More accurate figures, using a more appropriate, broader classification system on par with other EU countries, show a very different story.

 One of these stats is not like the other

The recent United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) report put Ireland's maternal death rate at 9 per 100,000. (Irish Independent)

 
The Maternal Death Enquiry (MDE) Ireland has reported a rate of 8 per 100,000 in their recent report with specific mention to issues in the classification and collection of data, with general hospitals and the Irish coroner system both cited as areas which lead to under-reporting. As described here in the most recent MDE Ireland report (2009-2011):
 
"In Ireland, the Medical Death Notification Form completed by a medical practitioner contains
a question “If the deceased was female, was she known to have been pregnant at the time of
death, or within the previous 42 days?” (Answer “yes” or “no” in all cases)13. The Coroner’s
certificate does not contain this question.

 
In the case of Death Notification Forms, a review of MDE cases to date has shown that the
question on pregnancy status has been not being correctly completed in some cases. Review
of death certificates issued by the GRO office, following receipt of a Coroner’s certificate,dentified information on current or recent pregnancy was absent in many cases of indirect
maternal deaths. These issues clearly impact on ascertainment of reliable maternal mortality
data."
 
From MDE Ireland's 2009-2011 report regarding CSO figures:
 
"Comparative available data for the years 2009 and 2010 showed that all but one maternal
direct death was identified by the CSO. However, none of the thirteen indirect or six
coincidental maternal deaths were identified by the CSO."

Despite these noted inaccuracies, flaws and numerous reports of Ireland's true maternal death rate, it is the CSO figures which are regularly quoted by Government and Political representatives. We've all heard the 'Ireland is the safest place to have a baby' speeches, however, what most of us don't realise is that that with a maternal death rate of 8 per 100,000 we are on par with many of our EU counterparts and actually ranks worse than others. For example:

France 8 per 100,000
UK 10 per 100,000
Germany 7 per 100,000
Belgium 5 per 100,000

AIMS Ireland's position:
 
Calculations for a Nation's Maternal Death rate is an international standard for measuring safety in maternal health services, however, AIMS Ireland feel this statistic alone does not provide full insight into safety of care provided to mothers and babies. As a developed Western nation, with access to ante-natal care, nutrition, hygiene, and technology, it is more appropriate to measure safety not only in terms of death but also the 'near misses' and serious health implications to mothers and babies as a result of a pregnancy/birth (morbidity) - both physical and psychological.
 
From the Irish Times, 13/1/2015 regarding CSO figures:
 
 
UNFPA rates - Irish Independent 19/11/2014
 
 
Maternal Death Enquiry Ireland (MDE Ireland) 2009-2011 report:

Monday, 12 January 2015

A Year in Review of Irish Maternity Services - 2014 AIMS Ireland (video) #MadAsHell #AIMSIreland

AIMS Ireland look back over 2014 with this short video. Thank you to everyone who marched with us, shared our information, and supported us over the year.  We would especially like to thank our members and those who made donations to AIMS Ireland – in time as volunteers and financially – AIMS Ireland could not exist without your help!

To view click here: 2014 AIMS Ireland

Wednesday, 31 December 2014

AIMSI statement on the removal of somatic support to a woman with an unviable foetus of 18 weeks gestation

AIMSI welcomes the High Court Judgement of the 26th December 2014 that somatic support be switched off for a woman who was declared clinically dead on December 3rd 2014. Our sympathies go out to her family and we hope that the family will now be able to grieve the loss of their loved one in dignity and peace.
AIMSI were disappointed that this case arose in the first place. It is a well known medical fact that a foetus of 15 weeks is not viable and we fail to see what possible reasons there could have been for medics to invoke the 8th amendment and put the woman's family, especially her children through such distress. The natural course of events is that when a woman dies in such circumstances, the foetus she is carrying dies with her.
This case highlights, the control over women's bodies in maternity care that the State presumes itself to have. Even though this woman was clinically dead, the State still presumed to have control over her womb, and medical professionals thought it appropriate to seek clarification on whether they should continue to use her body to incubate a 15 week old foetus. The Constitution is supposed to maintain the right to bodily autonomy in life and one hopes also in death. This does not appear to have happened in this case. AIMSI sincerely hopes that no other family will ever be subject to such distress in the Irish Maternity System.
Whilst this was a particularly macabre episode of an invocation of the 8th Amendment, AIMSI notes that the 8th Amendment is repeatedly used in the context of maternity rights to deny women the right to bodily autonomy in terms of decision making in pregnancy, in labour in birth and in the postpartum period. Women have reported being  forced into caesarean births, forced into invasive procedures during labour, threatened with social services and in some cases threatened with the Gardai and mental health services for trying to assert their right to bodily autonomy. The 8th Amendment is also repeatedly used to justify a swath of clinical practises during labour and birth which the international research based evidence does not support. Finally, in contrast to maternity guidelines and policies in other countries, where women are given the final choice over their care and that of their baby, the 8th Amendment in Ireland is used to suppress women's choice and give ultimate control over a woman's body when pregnant to the State.
AIMSI continues to call for a repeal of the 8th Amendment to ensure that women and their families are able to make informed choices about the care that they receive during pregnancy, labour and birth in Ireland.
December 31st 2014

Thursday, 18 December 2014

FAO: HSE - A helpful synopsis of well respected Clinical Guidelines on the use of Synthetic Oxytocin



 

AIMS Ireland are very surprised to see the HSE state that there are no national or international evidence based guidelines on the use of synthetic oxytocin in labour.

"A spokesperson for the HSE, which jointly operates the National Clinical Programme for Obstetrics and Gynaecology with the RCPI, told MI: “At present, we are not aware of any national or international guidelines to guide practice on oxytocin augmentation in labour. The programme supports the development and use of local guidelines at each maternity unit, but the programme hopes to build a national consensus on a standardised guideline over the next year.” Medical Independent - December 18, 2014

The comment comes from an article on surveys taken by the States Claims Agency to the 19 Irish public maternity hospitals on the use of synthetic oxytocin in labour following observations that there is a frequency in obstetric claims when the drug is used, suggesting synthetic oxytocin to be a contributing factor.

Syntocinon/ Pitocin /Oxytocin is a synthetic version of a hormone present in labour which stimulates contractions. Synthetic Oxytocin is routinely used in Irish maternity units to synthetically start (induce) or speed up labour. It is a common component of Active Management of Labour, in which a woman's labour is managed by health care providers, using intervention and drugs, to 'speed up' process. Synthetic Oxytocin is linked to an increase of adverse effects for women. A recent study has also suggested that synthetic oxytocin is an independent risk factor for adverse effects in full term newborns. With some Irish units reporting use of synthetic oxytocin in nearly half of first time mothers during labour, AIMS Ireland are deeply concerned that our national policy makers within the Health Service Executive appear to be unaware of clinical practice guidelines on its use.


In August 2013, AIMS Ireland reviewed the evidence and international guidelines for induction of labour and the use of synthetic oxytocin for the article "Induction of Labour - Is it Right for You?" as part of our 42 Weeks Campaign.

AIMS Ireland: Induction of Labour - Is it Right for You?

"A hormone drip containing synthetic oxytocin (Syntocinon®) should only be offered if the membrane sweep or prostaglandins have not been effective in starting labour. It is also offered to women who may have been induced by membrane sweep or prostaglandins but whose contractions and cervical dilation have slowed completely or appear to have stopped. It is not recommended for use until at least 6 hours after receiving prostaglandin gel or 12 hours after removal of the prostaglandin pessary. Whether to consent to induction of labour, or not, is a choice that at least 1 out of 3 women will have to make in her maternity care in Ireland."http://aimsireland.ie/induction-of-labour-is-it-right-for-you/


AIMS Ireland felt it would be helpful to provide a synopsis of these practice guidelines from well respected sources.

International Guidelines on Induction and the Use of Synthetic Oxytocin


“The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in the UK recommends that induction of labour has a large impact on the health of women and their babies, and so needs to be clearly clinically justified."

NICE Guidance Recommendations 2014: Intrapartum Care
https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg190/chapter/1-recommendations

Key points: quoted directly from NICE

1.12.1 Do not offer or advise clinical intervention if labour is progressing normally and the woman and baby are well. [2007]

1.12.2 In all stages of labour, women who have left the normal care pathway because of the development of complications can return to it if/when the complication is resolved. [2007]
 
1.12.10 Do not routinely offer the package known as active management of labour (one‑to‑one continuous support; strict definition of established labour; early routine amniotomy; routine 2‑hourly vaginal examination; oxytocin if labour becomes slow). [2007]

1.12.12 Do not use combined early amniotomy with use of oxytocin routinely. [2007]

1.12.13 If delay in the established first stage is suspected, take the following into account:
  • parity
  • cervical dilatation and rate of change
  • uterine contractions
  • station and position of presenting part
  • the woman's emotional state
  • referral to the appropriate healthcare professional.

    Offer the woman support, hydration, and appropriate and effective pain relief. [2007]
 
1.12.14 If delay in the established first stage is suspected, assess all aspects of progress in labour when diagnosing delay, including:
  • cervical dilatation of less than 2 cm in 4 hours for first labours
  • cervical dilatation of less than 2 cm in 4 hours or a slowing in the progress of labour for second or subsequent labours
  • descent and rotation of the baby's head
  • changes in the strength, duration and frequency of uterine contractions. [2007
 
 
1.12.22 If oxytocin is used, ensure that the time between increments of the dose is no more frequent than every 30 minutes. Increase oxytocin until there are 4–5 contractions in 10 minutes. (See also recommendation 1.10.3.) [2007]

1.10.35 If there are any concerns about the baby's wellbeing, think about the possible underlying causes and start one or more of the following conservative measures based on an assessment of the most likely cause(s):
  • encourage the woman to mobilise or adopt a left‑lateral position, and in particular to avoid being supine
  • offer oral or intravenous fluids
  • offer paracetamol if the woman has a raised temperature
  • reduce contraction frequency by:
    • stopping oxytocin if it is being used (the consultant obstetrician should decide whether and when to restart oxytocin) and/or
    • offering a tocolytic drug (a suggested regimen is subcutaneous terbutaline 0.25 mg). [new 2014]


WHO: recommendations for induction of labour
http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/maternal_perinatal_health/9789241501156/en/

Key Points: Quoted directly fromWHO
* Induction of labour should be performed only when there is a clear medical indication for it and the expected benefits outweigh its potential harms.

* In applying the recommendations, consideration must be given to the actual condition, wishes and preferences of each woman, with emphasis being placed on cervical status, the specific method of induction of labour and associated conditions such as parity and rupture of membranes.
          * Induction of labour should be performed with caution since the procedure carries the risk of  uterine hyperstimulation and rupture and fetal distress.

WHO evidence:

Evidence related to the use of intravenous oxytocin for induction of labour at term was available from a Cochrane systematic review (15). Compared with placebo or expectant management, the use of oxytocin alone was associated with fewer vaginal births not achieved within 24 hours of induction of labour (three trials, 399 participants, RR 0.16, 95% CI 0.1–0.25), fewer admissions to a neonatal intensive care unit (seven trials, 4387 participants, RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.68–0.92), and increased risk of caesarean section (24 trials, 6620 participants, RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.01–1.35) (EB Table 2.1.1).

The use of intravenous oxytocin alone has also been compared with prostaglandins (EB Tables 2.1.2, 2.1.3, 2.1.4). Overall, the use of prostaglandins was associated with a reduced risk of vaginal birth not achieved within 24 hours and fewer caesarean births.

ACOG Induction Guidelines revised in 2013

From ACOG press release: "A physician capable of performing a cesarean should be readily available any time induction is used in the event that the induction isn't successful in producing a vaginal delivery," notes Dr. Ramin. Although rare, there are potential complications with some methods of labor induction. "These guidelines will help physicians utilize the most appropriate method depending on the unique characteristics of the pregnant woman and her fetus."

Guideline on Induction: http://www.acog.org/About-ACOG/ACOG-Departments/Deliveries-Before-39-Weeks/ACOG-Clinical-Guidelines

2013 ACOG: Study Finds Adverse Effects of Pitocin (Synthetic Oxytocin) in Newborns:

“Induction and augmentation of labor with the hormone oxytocin may not be as safe for full-term newborns as previously believed, according to research presented today at the Annual Clinical Meeting of The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Researchers say this is the first study of its kind to present data on the adverse effects of Pitocin use on newborns...As a community of practitioners, we know the adverse effects of Pitocin from the maternal side,” Dr. Tsimis said, “but much less so from the neonatal side. These results suggest that Pitocin use is associated with adverse effects on neonatal outcomes. It underscores the importance of using valid medical indications when Pitocin is used.”

http://www.acog.org/About-ACOG/News-Room/News-Releases/2013/Study-Finds-Adverse-Effects-of-Pitocin-in-Newborns



ACOG: Oxytocin for Induction PDF:

 

"The side effects of oxytocin use are principally dose related; uterine tachysystole and Category II or III FHR tracings are the most common side effects. Uterine tachysystole may result in abruptio placentae or uterine rupture. Uterine rupture secondary to oxytocin use is rare even in parous women"

* Uterine Tachysystole is when a woman's uterus is over-stimulated resulting in more than the normal pattern of contractions in a period of 30 minutes.


"Low- or high-dose oxytocin regimens are appropriate for women in whom induction of labor is indicated"

 

 

"If uterine tachysystole with Category III FHR tracings occur, prompt evaluation is required and intravenous infusion of oxytocin should be decreased or discontinued correct the pattern (32). Additional measures may include turning the woman on her side and administering oxygen or more intravenous fluid. If uterine tachysystole persists, use of terbutaline or other tocolytics may be considered. Hypotension may occur following a rapid intravenous injection of oxytocin; therefore,
is imperative that a dilute oxytocin infusion be used even in the immediate puerperium."

 
"The use of a checklist is highly recommended when administering oxytocin. Checklists provide prerequisites at the point of patient care to safely initiate oxytocin and help to identify situations that
require its discontinuation. The Hospital Corporation of America (HCA) and the Institute of Healthcare Improvement (IHI) have developed oxytocin checklists that could be incorporated into your institution’s protocol."
 


 So, with all this information available to consumers at just the click of a mouse how is it that the National Health Service Executive, with governance to make policies affecting the care of women and babies in our maternity services, are not?
 









 

Full Article: State Claims Agency surveys maternity services on oxytocin http://www.medicalindependent.ie/57516/state_claims_agency_surveys_maternity_services_on_oxytocin

Thursday, 9 October 2014

Midwife-Led Birth is Safe Birth

Midwife-Led Birth is Safe Birth. At Home, Hospital or Freestanding.
Safe for women and babies. Better outcomes for women and babies
Cost effective for health services.


Read the latest evidence:...

NICE recommendations re home births in England and Wales, Intrapartum Care, May 2014: http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/indevelopment/GID-CGWAVER109

Low-risk women (women without medical conditions or other factors that put them at increased risk) who have given birth before should be advised to plan to give birth at home or at a midwifery-led unit (freestanding or alongside).

_____________________________

Findings from the National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Oxford, Birthplace Cohort Study, 2011
https://www.npeu.ox.ac.uk/birthplace/results

For women having a second or subsequent baby, home births and midwifery unit births appear to be safe for the baby and offer benefits for the mother

_____________________________

HSE Mid-U Report: http://www.hse.ie/eng/services/news/newsarchive/200920082007Archive/dec09/MidUstudy.html

The 'MidU' ('Midwifery Unit') study showed that midwifery-led care, as practised in these units, is as safe as consultant-led care but uses less intervention in pregnancy and childbirth.

Women's satisfaction with the facilities was apparent in the study and 85% of those attending the MLUs said they would recommend the care they had received to a friend, compared with 70% of those having usual care. Although facilities in the MLUs were quite luxurious, the cost of care for each woman was €332.80 less than in the usual hospital system